Publications

2019

Cole, Evan S, Ellen DiDomenico, Gerald Cochran, Adam J Gordon, Walid F Gellad, Janice Pringle, Jack Warwick, et al. (2019) 2019. “The Role of Primary Care in Improving Access to Medication-Assisted Treatment for Rural Medicaid Enrollees With Opioid Use Disorder.”. Journal of General Internal Medicine 34 (6): 936-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-04943-6.

BACKGROUND: The opioid epidemic has disproportionately affected rural areas, where a limited number of health care providers offer medication-assisted treatment (MAT), the mainstay of treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). Rural residents with OUD may face multiple barriers to engagement in MAT including long travel distances.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the degree to which rural residents with OUD are engaged with primary care providers (PCPs), describe the role of rural PCPs in MAT delivery, and estimate the association between enrollee distance to MAT prescribers and MAT utilization.

DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS: Medicaid-enrolled adults diagnosed with OUD in 23 rural Pennsylvania counties.

MAIN MEASURES: Primary care utilization, MAT utilization, distance to nearest possible MAT prescriber, mean distance traveled to actual MAT prescribers, and continuity of pharmacotherapy.

KEY RESULTS: Of the 7930 Medicaid enrollees with a diagnosis of OUD, a minority (18.6%) received their diagnosis during a PCP visit even though enrollees with OUD had 4.1 visits to PCPs per person-year in 2015. Among enrollees with an OUD diagnosis recorded during a PCP visit, about half (751, 50.8%) received MAT, most of whom (508, 67.6%) received MAT from a PCP. Enrollees with OUD with at least one PCP visit were more likely than those without a PCP visit to receive MAT (32.7% vs. 25%; p < 0.001), and filled more buprenorphine and naltrexone prescriptions (mean = 11.1 vs. 9.3; p < 0.001). The median of the distances traveled to actual MAT prescribers was 48.8 miles, compared to a median of 4.2 miles to the nearest available MAT prescriber. Enrollees traveling a mean distance greater than 45 miles to MAT prescribers were less likely to receive continuity of pharmacotherapy (OR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.56-0.91, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS: PCP utilization among rural Medicaid enrollees diagnosed with OUD is high, presenting a potential intervention point to treat OUD, particularly if the enrollee's PCP is located nearer than their MAT prescriber.

Moyo, Patience, Xinhua Zhao, Carolyn T Thorpe, Joshua M Thorpe, Florentina E Sileanu, John P Cashy, Jennifer A Hale, et al. (2019) 2019. “Dual Receipt of Prescription Opioids From the Department of Veterans Affairs and Medicare Part D and Prescription Opioid Overdose Death Among Veterans: A Nested Case-Control Study.”. Annals of Internal Medicine 170 (7): 433-42. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-2574.

BACKGROUND: More than half of enrollees in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) are also covered by Medicare and can choose to receive their prescriptions from VA or from Medicare-participating providers. Such dual-system care may lead to unsafe opioid use if providers in these 2 systems do not coordinate care or if prescription use is not tracked between systems.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between dual-system opioid prescribing and death from prescription opioid overdose.

DESIGN: Nested case-control study.

SETTING: VA and Medicare Part D.

PARTICIPANTS: Case and control patients were identified from all veterans enrolled in both VA and Part D who filled at least 1 opioid prescription from either system. The 215 case patients who died of a prescription opioid overdose in 2012 or 2013 were matched (up to 1:4) with 833 living control patients on the basis of date of death (that is, index date), using age, sex, race/ethnicity, disability, enrollment in Medicaid or low-income subsidies, managed care enrollment, region and rurality of residence, and a medication-based measure of comorbid conditions.

MEASUREMENTS: The exposure was the source of opioid prescriptions within 6 months of the index date, categorized as VA only, Part D only, or VA and Part D (that is, dual use). The outcome was unintentional or undetermined-intent death from prescription opioid overdose, identified from the National Death Index. The association between this outcome and source of opioid prescriptions was estimated using conditional logistic regression with adjustment for age, marital status, prescription drug monitoring programs, and use of other medications.

RESULTS: Among case patients, the mean age was 57.3 years (SD, 9.1), 194 (90%) were male, and 181 (84%) were non-Hispanic white. Overall, 60 case patients (28%) and 117 control patients (14%) received dual opioid prescriptions. Dual users had significantly higher odds of death from prescription opioid overdose than those who received opioids from VA only (odds ratio [OR], 3.53 [95% CI, 2.17 to 5.75]; P < 0.001) or Part D only (OR, 1.83 [CI, 1.20 to 2.77]; P = 0.005).

LIMITATION: Data are from 2012 to 2013 and cannot capture prescriptions obtained outside the VA or Medicare Part D systems.

CONCLUSION: Among veterans enrolled in VA and Part D, dual use of opioid prescriptions was independently associated with death from prescription opioid overdose. This risk factor for fatal overdose among veterans underscores the importance of care coordination across health care systems to improve opioid prescribing safety.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.

Moyo, Patience, Xinhua Zhao, Carolyn T Thorpe, Joshua M Thorpe, Florentina E Sileanu, John P Cashy, Jennifer A Hale, et al. (2019) 2019. “Patterns of Opioid Prescriptions Received Prior to Unintentional Prescription Opioid Overdose Death Among Veterans.”. Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy : RSAP 15 (8): 1007-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.10.023.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have assessed prescription opioid supply preceding death in individuals dying from unintentional prescription opioid overdoses, or described the characteristics of these individuals, particularly among Veterans.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the history of prescription opioid supply preceding prescription opioid overdose death among Veterans.

METHODS: In a national cohort of Veterans who filled ≥1 opioid prescriptions from the Veterans Health Administration (VA) or Medicare Part D during 2008-2013, we identified deaths from unintentional or undetermined-intent prescription opioid overdoses in 2012-2013. We captured opioid prescriptions using both linked VA and Part D data, and VA data only.

RESULTS: Among 1181 decedents, 643 (54.4%) had prescription opioid supply on the day of death, and 735 (62.2%) within 30 days based on linked data, compared to 40.1% and 46.7%, respectively, using VA data alone. Decedents with prescription opioid supply were significantly older and less likely to have alcohol or illicit drugs as co-occurring substances involved in the overdose. Using linked data, 241 (20.4%) decedents lacked prescription opioid supply within a year of death.

CONCLUSIONS: Many VA patients who die from prescription opioid overdose receive opioid prescriptions outside VA or not at all. It is important to supplement VA with non-VA data to more accurately measure prescription opioid exposure and improve opioid medication safety.

Donohue, Julie M, Jason N Kennedy, Christopher W Seymour, Timothy D Girard, Wei-Hsuan Lo-Ciganic, Catherine H Kim, Oscar C Marroquin, Patience Moyo, Chung-Chou H Chang, and Derek C Angus. (2019) 2019. “Patterns of Opioid Administration Among Opioid-Naive Inpatients and Associations With Postdischarge Opioid Use: A Cohort Study.”. Annals of Internal Medicine 171 (2): 81-90. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-2864.

BACKGROUND: Patterns of inpatient opioid use and their associations with postdischarge opioid use are poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE: To measure patterns in timing, duration, and setting of opioid administration in opioid-naive hospitalized patients and to examine associations with postdischarge use.

DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using electronic health record data from 2010 to 2014.

SETTING: 12 community and academic hospitals in Pennsylvania.

PATIENTS: 148 068 opioid-naive patients (191 249 admissions) with at least 1 outpatient encounter within 12 months before and after admission.

MEASUREMENTS: Number of days and patterns of inpatient opioid use; any outpatient use (self-report and/or prescription orders) 90 and 365 days after discharge.

RESULTS: Opioids were administered in 48% of admissions. Patients were given opioids for a mean of 67.9% (SD, 25.0%) of their stay. Location of administration of first opioid on admission, timing of last opioid before discharge, and receipt of nonopioid analgesics varied substantially. After adjustment for potential confounders, 5.9% of inpatients receiving opioids had outpatient use at 90 days compared with 3.0% of those without inpatient use (difference, 3.0 percentage points [95% CI, 2.8 to 3.2 percentage points]). Opioid use at 90 days was higher in inpatients receiving opioids less than 12 hours before discharge than in those with at least 24 opioid-free hours before discharge (7.5% vs. 3.9%; difference, 3.6 percentage points [CI, 3.3 to 3.9 percentage points]). Differences based on proportion of the stay with opioid use were modest (opioid use at 90 days was 6.4% and 5.4%, respectively, for patients with opioid use for ≥75% vs. ≤25% of their stay; difference, 1.0 percentage point [CI, 0.4 to 1.5 percentage points]). Associations were similar for opioid use 365 days after discharge.

LIMITATION: Potential unmeasured confounders related to opioid use.

CONCLUSION: This study found high rates of opioid administration to opioid-naive inpatients and associations between specific patterns of inpatient use and risk for long-term use after discharge.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: UPMC Health System and University of Pittsburgh.

Roberts, Eric T, Jacqueline Hayley Welsh, Julie M Donohue, and Lindsay M Sabik. (2019) 2019. “Association Of State Policies With Medicaid Disenrollment Among Low-Income Medicare Beneficiaries.”. Health Affairs (Project Hope) 38 (7): 1153-62. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05165.

For some low-income Medicare beneficiaries, Medicaid provides financial protection against Medicare's out-of-pocket costs, but many Medicare beneficiaries who qualify for Medicaid are not continuously enrolled. We examined Medicaid disenrollment among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries and the relationship between disenrollment and state policies. In the period 2012-16, 18.2 percent of Medicare beneficiaries who received full or partial Medicaid disenrolled for reasons other than death. More than 50 percent of Medicare beneficiaries who remained without Medicaid one year after disenrolling continued to receive low-income subsidies for Medicare Part D coverage with eligibility requirements similar to those of Medicaid. Among Medicare beneficiaries with continuous Part D subsidies, the rate of Medicaid disenrollment was 24 percent lower in states that automatically enrolled recipients of the federal Supplemental Security Income program in full Medicaid, 33 percent lower in states with more generous provider payment policies, and 37 percent lower in states with less restrictive asset limits for partial Medicaid. Policies that make it easier for people to maintain Medicaid eligibility and that enhance access to care in Medicaid via higher provider reimbursements may reduce disenrollment.

Progovac, Ana M, Mary Pettinger, Julie M Donohue, Chung-Chou H Joyce Chang, Karen A Matthews, Elizabeth B Habermann, Lewis H Kuller, et al. (2019) 2019. “Optimism May Moderate Screening Mammogram Frequency in Medicare: A Longitudinal Study.”. Medicine 98 (24): e15869. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015869.

Higher trait optimism and/or lower cynical hostility are associated with healthier behaviors and lower risk of morbidity and mortality, yet their association with health care utilization has been understudied. Whether these psychological attitudes are associated with breast cancer screening behavior is unknown. To assess the association of optimism and cynical hostility with screening mammography in older women and whether sociodemographic factors acted as mediators of these relationships, we used Women's Health Initiative (WHI) observational cohort survey data linked to Medicare claims. The sample includes WHI participants without history of breast cancer who were enrolled in Medicare Parts A and B for ≥2 years from 2005-2010, and who completed WHI baseline attitudinal questionnaires (n = 48,291). We used survival modeling to examine whether screening frequency varied by psychological attitudes (measured at study baseline) after adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics, health conditions, and healthcare-related variables. Psychological attitudes included trait optimism (Life Orientation Test-Revised) and cynical hostility (Cook Medley subscale), which were self-reported at study baseline. Sociodemographic, health conditions, and healthcare variables were self-reported at baseline and updated through 2005 as available. Contrary to our hypotheses, repeated events survival models showed that women with the lowest optimism scores (i.e., more pessimistic tendencies) received 5% more frequent screenings after complete covariate adjustment (p < .01) compared to the most optimistic group, and showed no association between cynical hostility and frequency of screening mammograms. Sociodemographic factors did not appear to mediate the relationship between optimism and screenings. However, higher levels of education and higher levels of income were associated with more frequent screenings (both p < .01). We also found that results for optimism were primarily driven by women who were aged 75 or older after January 2009, when changes to clinical guidelines lead to uncertainty about risks and benefits of screening in this age group. The study demonstrated that lower optimism, higher education, and higher income were all associated with more frequent screening mammograms in this sample after repeated events survival modeling and covariate adjustment.

Radomski, Thomas R, Xinhua Zhao, Joseph T Hanlon, Joshua M Thorpe, Carolyn T Thorpe, Jennifer G Naples, Florentina E Sileanu, et al. (2019) 2019. “Use of a Medication-Based Risk Adjustment Index to Predict Mortality Among Veterans Dually-Enrolled in VA and Medicare.”. Healthcare (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 7 (4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjdsi.2019.04.003.

BACKGROUND: There is systemic undercoding of medical comorbidities within administrative claims in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). This leads to bias when applying claims-based risk adjustment indices to compare outcomes between VA and non-VA settings. Our objective was to compare the accuracy of a medication-based risk adjustment index (RxRisk-VM) to diagnostic claims-based indices for predicting mortality.

METHODS: We modified the RxRisk-V index (RxRisk-VM) by incorporating VA and Medicare pharmacy and durable medical equipment claims in Veterans dually-enrolled in VA and Medicare in 2012. Using the concordance (C) statistic, we compared its accuracy in predicting 1 and 3-year all-cause mortality to the following models: demographics only, demographics plus prescription count, or demographics plus a diagnostic claims-based risk index (e.g., Charlson, Elixhauser, or Gagne). We also compared models containing demographics, RxRisk-VM, and a claims-based index.

RESULTS: In our cohort of 271,184 dually-enrolled Veterans (mean age = 70.5 years, 96.1% male, 81.7% non-Hispanic white), RxRisk-VM (C = 0.773) exhibited greater accuracy in predicting 1-year mortality than demographics only (C = 0.716) or prescription counts (C = 0.744), but was less accurate than the Charlson (C = 0.794), Elixhauser (C = 0.80), or Gagne (C = 0.810) indices (all P < 0.001). Combining RxRisk-VM with claims-based indices enhanced its accuracy over each index alone (all models C ≥ 0.81). Relative model performance was similar for 3-year mortality.

CONCLUSIONS: The RxRisk-VM index exhibited a high level of, but slightly less, accuracy in predicting mortality in comparison to claims-based risk indices.

IMPLICATIONS: Its application may enhance the accuracy of studies examining VA and non-VA care and enable risk adjustment when diagnostic claims are not available or biased.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

Metes, Ilinca D, Lingshu Xue, Chung-Chou H Chang, Haiden A Huskamp, Walid F Gellad, Wei-Hsuan Lo-Ciganic, Niteesh K Choudhry, Seth Richards-Shubik, Hasan Guclu, and Julie M Donohue. (2019) 2019. “Association Between Physician Adoption of a New Oral Anti-Diabetic Medication and Medicare and Medicaid Drug Spending.”. BMC Health Services Research 19 (1): 703. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4520-4.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, there is well-documented regional variation in prescription drug spending. However, the specific role of physician adoption of brand name drugs on the variation in patient-level prescription drug spending is still being investigated across a multitude of drug classes. Our study aims to add to the literature by determining the association between physician adoption of a first-in-class anti-diabetic (AD) drug, sitagliptin, and AD drug spending in the Medicare and Medicaid populations in Pennsylvania.

METHODS: We obtained physician-level data from QuintilesIMS Xponent™ database for Pennsylvania and constructed county-level measures of time to adoption and share of physicians adopting sitagliptin in its first year post-introduction. We additionally measured total AD drug spending for all Medicare fee-for-service and Part D enrollees (N = 125,264) and all Medicaid (N = 50,836) enrollees with type II diabetes in Pennsylvania for 2011. Finite mixture model regression, adjusting for patient socio-demographic/clinical characteristics, was used to examine the association between physician adoption of sitagliptin and AD drug spending.

RESULTS: Physician adoption of sitagliptin varied from 44 to 99% across the state's 67 counties. Average per capita AD spending was $1340 (SD $1764) in Medicare and $1291 (SD $1881) in Medicaid. A 10% increase in the share of physicians adopting sitagliptin in a county was associated with a 3.5% (95% CI: 2.0-4.9) and 5.3% (95% CI: 0.3-10.3) increase in drug spending for the Medicare and Medicaid populations, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: In a medication market with many choices, county-level adoption of sitagliptin was positively associated with AD spending in Medicare and Medicaid, two programs with different approaches to formulary management.

Moyo, Patience, Walid F Gellad, Lindsay M Sabik, Gerald T Cochran, Evan S Cole, Adam J Gordon, David K Kelley, and Julie M Donohue. (2019) 2019. “Opioid Prescribing Safety Measures in Medicaid Enrollees With and Without Cancer.”. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 57 (4): 540-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2019.05.019.

INTRODUCTION: Opioid prescribing safety among individuals with cancer is poorly understood. This study estimates the prevalence of Pharmacy Quality Alliance opioid measures among individuals with cancer undergoing or not undergoing active treatment versus those without cancer.

METHODS: Pennsylvania Medicaid data (2016) were analyzed in 2018 to identify adults aged 18-64 years with and without cancer diagnoses who had 2 or more opioid prescriptions. Active cancer treatment, defined as having chemotherapy, radiotherapy, cancer surgery, or hospitalization with a primary diagnosis of cancer, was evaluated from October 2015 to December 2016 allowing a ≥3-month look-back period for cancer diagnoses observed in the first quarter of 2016. Opioid dosages (>120 morphine milligram equivalents for ≥90 consecutive days), multiple providers (4 or more prescribers and 4 or more pharmacies), and opioid and benzodiazepines overlapping ≥30 days were evaluated.

RESULTS: The sample with opioid prescriptions included 111,491 enrollees without cancer diagnoses and 12,819 with cancer, 58.8% of whom were not in active cancer treatment. Among enrollees undergoing cancer treatment, with cancer but not in active treatment, and without cancer, the prevalence of high morphine milligram equivalents was 7.1%, 6.0%, and 4.7% (p<0.001), respectively. The corresponding prevalence of multiple providers was 6.7%, 4.1%, and 3.4% (p<0.001). Concurrent opioid and benzodiazepine prescriptions occurred in 28.6%, 30.5%, and 26.8% (p<0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with cancer, regardless of treatment status, had higher-risk opioid use based on Pharmacy Quality Alliance measures versus those without cancer. Their systematic exclusion from opioid quality surveillance could create missed opportunities to identify patients at high risk of adverse opioid-related outcomes.