Publications

2021

Fitzpatrick, Margaret A, Katie J Suda, Linda Poggensee, Amanda Vivo, Marissa Wirth, Geneva Wilson, Martin Evans, and Charlesnika T Evans. (2021) 2021. “Epidemiology and Clinical Outcomes Associated With Extensively Drug-Resistant (XDR) Acinetobacter in US Veterans’ Affairs (VA) Medical Centers.”. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 42 (3): 305-10. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2020.450.

OBJECTIVE: Although infections caused by Acinetobacter baumannii are often healthcare-acquired, difficult to treat, and associated with high mortality, epidemiologic data for this organism are limited. We describe the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and outcomes for patients with extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (XDRAB).

DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING: Department of Veterans' Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs).

PARTICIPANTS: Patients with XDRAB cultures (defined as nonsusceptible to at least 1 agent in all but 2 or fewer classes) at VAMCs between 2012 and 2018.

METHODS: Microbiology and clinical data was extracted from national VA datasets. We used descriptive statistics to summarize patient characteristics and outcomes and bivariate analyses to compare outcomes by culture source.

RESULTS: Among 11,546 patients with 15,364 A. baumannii cultures, 408 (3.5%) patients had 667 (4.3%) XDRAB cultures. Patients with XDRAB were older (mean age, 68 years; SD, 12.2) with median Charlson index 3 (interquartile range, 1-5). Respiratory specimens (n = 244, 36.6%) and urine samples (n = 187, 28%) were the most frequent sources; the greatest proportion of patients were from the South (n = 162, 39.7%). Most patients had had antibiotic exposures (n = 362, 88.7%) and hospital or long-term care admissions (n = 331, 81%) in the prior 90 days. Polymyxins, tigecycline, and minocycline demonstrated the highest susceptibility. Also, 30-day mortality (n = 96, 23.5%) and 1-year mortality (n = 199, 48.8%) were high, with significantly higher mortality in patients with blood cultures.

CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of Acinetobacter baumannii in the VA that was XDR was low, but treatment options are extremely limited and clinical outcomes were poor. Prevention of healthcare-associated XDRAB infection should remain a priority, and novel antibiotics for XDRAB treatment are urgently needed.

Wilson, Geneva M, Margaret Fitzpatrick, Kyle Walding, Beverly Gonzalez, Marin L Schweizer, Katie J Suda, and Charlesnika T Evans. (2021) 2021. “Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes Using Ceftazidime/Avibactam, Ceftolozane/Tazobactam, and Meropenem/Vaborbactam for the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections.”. Open Forum Infectious Diseases 8 (2): ofaa651. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa651.

Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T), ceftazidime-avibactam (C/A), and meropenem/vaborbactam (M/V) are new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase combination antibiotics commonly used to treat multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDRPA) and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections. This review reports the clinical success rates for C/T, C/A, and M/V. PubMed and EMBASE were searched from January 1, 2012, through September 2, 2020, for publications detailing the use of C/T, C/A, and M/V. A meta-analysis determined the pooled effectiveness of C/T, C/A, and M/V. The literature search returned 1950 publications; 29 publications representing 1620 patients were retained. Pneumonia was the predominant infection type (49.8%). MDRPA was the major pathogen treated (65.3%). The pooled clinical success rate was 73.3% (95% CI, 68.9%-77.5%). C/T, C/A, or M/V resistance was reported in 8.9% of the population. These antibiotics had a high clinical success rate in patients with complicated infections and limited treatment options. Larger studies comparing C/T, C/A, and M/V against other antibiotic regimens are needed.

Teoh, Leanne, Wendy Thompson, and Katie J Suda. (2021) 2021. “Authors’ Response.”. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) 152 (1): 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2020.11.007.
Ellsworth, Emily M, Kevin J Bacigalupo, Kavita R Palla, Seema S Limaye, Margaret J Walkosz, Sandra T Szczecinski, and Katie J Suda. (2021) 2021. “Risk Factors and Antipsychotic Usage Patterns Associated With Terminal Delirium in a Veteran Long-Term Care Hospice Population.”. Federal Practitioner : For the Health Care Professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS 38 (5): 202-8. https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0131.

BACKGROUND: The development of delirium is very common in terminally ill patients. However, risk factors for terminal delirium in the veteran population are poorly identified. The purpose of this study was to (1) Identify risk factors for terminal delirium in a US Department of Veterans Affairs inpatient hospice population; (2) Assess usage patterns of antipsychotics for treatment of terminal delirium; and (3) Describe nursing assessment, nonpharmacologic interventions, and documentation of terminal delirium.

METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study of veterans who expired while admitted into hospice care at a long-term care hospice unit during the period of October 1, 2013 to September 30, 2015. Veterans' medical records were reviewed for the 2 weeks prior to the recorded death.

RESULTS: Of 307 veterans admitted for hospice care, 67.4% required antipsychotics in the last 2 weeks of life for the treatment of terminal delirium. The average number of antipsychotic doses given was 14.9 doses per patient. The risk factors that were identified included the use of steroids, opioids, or anticholinergics; Vietnam-era veterans with liver disease; veterans with cancer and a comorbid mental health disorder; and veterans with a history of drug and/or alcohol abuse.

CONCLUSIONS: More than half of veterans admitted for hospice care experienced terminal delirium requiring treatment with antipsychotics. The identification of veterans most likely to develop terminal delirium will allow for early nonpharmacologic interventions and potentially decrease the need for treatment with antipsychotic medications.

Hubbard, Colin C, Charlesnika T Evans, Gregory S Calip, Susan A Rowan, Walid F Gellad, Allen Campbell, Alan E Gross, et al. (2021) 2021. “Characteristics Associated With Opioid and Antibiotic Prescribing by Dentists.”. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 60 (5): 648-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2020.11.017.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study is to identify county-level characteristics that may be high-impact targets for opioid and antibiotic interventions to improve dental prescribing.

METHODS: Prescriptions during 2012-2017 were extracted from the IQVIA Longitudinal Prescription database. Primary outcomes were yearly county-level antibiotic and opioid prescribing rates. Multivariable negative binomial regression identified associations between prescribing rates and county-level characteristics. All analyses occurred in 2020.

RESULTS: Over time, dental opioid prescribing rates decreased by 20% (from 4.02 to 3.22 per 100 people), whereas antibiotic rates increased by 5% (from 6.85 to 7.19 per 100 people). Higher number of dentists per capita, higher proportion of female residents, and higher proportion of residents aged <65 years were associated with increased opioid rates. Relative to location in the West, location in the Northeast (59%, 95% CI=52, 65) and Midwest (64%, 95% CI=60, 70) was associated with lower opioid prescribing rates. Higher clinician density, median household income, proportion female, and proportion White were all independently associated with higher antibiotic rates. Location in the Northeast (149%, 95% CI=137, 162) and Midwest (118%, 95% CI=111, 125) was associated with higher antibiotic rates. Opioid and antibiotic prescribing rates were positively associated.

CONCLUSIONS: Dental prescribing of opioids is decreasing, whereas dental antibiotic prescribing is increasing. High prescribing of antibiotics is associated with high prescribing of opioids. Strategies focused on optimizing dental antibiotics and opioids are needed given their impact on population health.

Basu, Sanjay, Hui Shao, Jing Luo, Kasia Lipska, Katie J Suda, and John S Yudkin. (2021) 2021. “Estimates of Insulin Needs and Dispensation Given Wastage, Alternative Glycemic Targets, and Non-Insulin Therapies in US Populations With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Microsimulation Study.”. Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications 35 (4): 107839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2020.107839.

AIMS: Registries and health plans estimate insulin need for population health metrics. We sought to identify how such estimates affect population- and individual-level estimates of over- and under-treatment.

METHODS: We developed a microsimulation comparing estimated insulin need to dispensation using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 2005-2016, N= 2832) and Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS, 2005-2016, N = 29,615).

RESULTS: From NHANES,  21.6% of people with type 2 diabetes would require insulin to achieve a HbA1c target of 7% after maximum titration of two non-insulins (60.7 IU/person/day, or 84,629,833 vials of 1000 IU in the US). From MEPS, we observed 57.4 IU/person/day of insulin dispensed (81,585,842 vials). About 29% of people were dispensed at least two standard deviations less than their estimated need, and 22% at least two standard deviations more than estimated need. Population-level need estimates reduced 39.4% if liberalizing HbA1c targets to 8% for people ≥75 years old.

CONCLUSIONS: Estimated insulin needs of people with type 2 diabetes in the U.S. are consistent with their dispensed insulin at the population level, but are sensitive to HbA1c targets for older adults, and conceal under- and over-treated subpopulations.

Teoh, Leanne, Wendy Thompson, Colin C Hubbard, Walid Gellad, Kathryn Finn, and Katie J Suda. (2021) 2021. “Comparison of Dental Benzodiazepine Prescriptions From the U.S., England, and Australia From 2013 to 2018.”. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 61 (1): 73-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2021.01.025.

INTRODUCTION: Benzodiazepines contribute to substance use disorder and are often part of polydrug abuse, most frequently with opioids. Although dental opioid prescribing differs significantly between countries, little is known about the patterns of dental benzodiazepine prescribing. The aim of this study is to compare dental prescribing of benzodiazepines among the U.S., England, and Australia in 2013-2018.

METHODS: Population-level data were accessed from national data sets for each country for dental benzodiazepine prescriptions. Outcome measures of dental benzodiazepine prescribing included: (1) prescribing rates by population for each year and (2) the quantity and relative proportion of benzodiazepines by type for each country. The analysis was conducted in 2020.

RESULTS: Between 2013 and 2018, U.S. dentists prescribed 23 times more than English dentists and 7 times more than Australian dentists by population. During the study period, the rate of dental benzodiazepine prescribing decreased in England and the U.S. but increased in Australia. Despite these trends, U.S. dental prescribing rates remained 28 times more than English dentists and 6 times more than Australian dentists in 2018 (U.S., 3.10 prescriptions/1,000 population; England, 0.11 prescriptions/1,000 population; Australia, 0.50 prescriptions/1,000 population). U.S. dentists prescribed a wider variety of benzodiazepines than English and Australian dentists. Diazepam was most commonly prescribed in all countries. In the U.S., triazolam, lorazepam, and alprazolam were next most commonly prescribed. Temazepam was next most frequent in England and Australia.

CONCLUSIONS: Significant variation in benzodiazepine prescribing rates and types were seen among the countries. To improve patient safety, further investigation into the appropriate use and choices of benzodiazepines in dentistry is needed.