Publications

2008

Haskell, Sally G, Bevanne Bean-Mayberry, Joseph L Goulet, Melissa Skanderson, Chester B Good, and Amy C Justice. (2008) 2008. “Determinants of Hormone Therapy Discontinuation Among Female Veterans Nationally.”. Military Medicine 173 (1): 91-6.

PURPOSE: The growing presence of female veterans within the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system highlights the need to assess the quality of and access to gender-specific care for menopause. We assessed the use of hormone therapy (HT) among female veterans before and after the release of the Women's Health Initiative clinical trial results and evaluated whether the structure of women's health care services within the VA system affects the use of HT.

METHODS: We identified all female veterans using HT in 2001 by using the VA pharmacy benefits management database and administrative data. Subjects identified as using HT in 2001 were evaluated to determine estrogen use status in 2003 and 2004. We calculated the change in HT use over time and performed multivariate analyses to identify patient and utilization determinants of HT discontinuation.

RESULTS: In 2001, 36,222 female veterans used HT. By 2004, 23,924 (66%) had discontinued HT. Subjects who had used a VA women's clinic or were younger (40-54 years of age) were significantly less likely to discontinue HT. However, Hispanic ethnicity, African American race, and clinical diagnoses such as heart disease and mastectomy were significantly associated with discontinuation.

CONCLUSION: Discontinuation rates in the VA system parallel those in the private sector. However, patients with any use of VA women's clinics were less likely to discontinue HT, indicating a practice setting variation that may indicate either more specific care or differential implementation of the new HT guidelines. Further research is warranted to assess whether a disparity occurs according to practice setting (or provider factors) with rapid shifts in guidelines.

Tobia, Colleen Cook, Sherrie L Aspinall, Chester B Good, Michael J Fine, and Joseph T Hanlon. (2008) 2008. “Appropriateness of Antibiotic Prescribing in Veterans With Community-Acquired Pneumonia, Sinusitis, or Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Bronchitis: A Cross-Sectional Study.”. Clinical Therapeutics 30 (6): 1135-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.06.009.

BACKGROUND: Studies that have assessed antibiotic appropriateness in acute respiratory tract infections (RTIs) with a likely bacterial etiology have focused only on antibiotic choice and ignored other important aspects of prescribing, such as dosing, drug-drug interactions, and duration of treatment.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and predictors of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing practices in outpatients with acute bacterial RTIs (community-acquired pneumonia [CAP], sinusitis, or acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis [AECB]).

METHODS: This retrospective, cross-sectional study enrolled outpatients with CAP, sinusitis, or AECB who were evaluated in a Veterans Affairs emergency department over a 1-year period. Using electronic medical records, trained research assistants completed data-collection forms that included patient characteristics (eg, marital status, history of alcohol abuse), diagnosis, comorbidities, concurrent medications, and antibiotics prescribed. To assess antimicrobial appropriateness, a trained clinical pharmacist reviewed the data-collection forms and applied a Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI), which rated the appropriateness of a medication using 10 criteria: indication, effectiveness, dosage, directions, practicality (defined as capability of being used or being put into practice), drug-drug interactions, drug-disease interactions, unnecessary duplication, duration, and expensiveness (defined as the cost of the drug compared with other agents of similar efficacy and tolerability). Previous studies have found good inter- and intrarater reliabilities between a clinical pharmacist's and an internal medicine physician's MAI ratings (kappa=0.83 and 0.92, respectively).

RESULTS: One hundred fifty-three patients were included (mean age, 58 years; 92% male; and 65% white). Overall, 99 of 153 patients (65%) had inappropriate antibiotic prescribing as assessed using the MAI. Expensiveness (60 patients [39%]), impracticality (32 [21%]), and incorrect dosage (15 [10%]) were the most frequently rated problem. Penicillins, quinolones, and macrolides were the most common antibiotic classes prescribed inappropriately. A history of alcohol abuse was associated with a lower likelihood of inappropriate prescribing compared with no history of alcohol abuse (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.32; 95% CI, 0.10-0.98), while patients who were married were more likely to receive inappropriately prescribed antibiotics than those who were not married (AOR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.25-5.59).

CONCLUSIONS: Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing based on the MAI criteria was common (65%) in this selected patient population with acute bacterial RTIs, and often involved problems with expensiveness (39%), impracticality (21%), and incorrect dosage (10%). Future interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing should consider aspects beyond choice of agent.

Donohue, Julie M, Michael A Fischer, Haiden A Huskamp, and Joel S Weissman. (2008) 2008. “Potential Savings from an Evidence-Based Consumer-Oriented Public Education Campaign on Prescription Drugs.”. Health Services Research 43 (5 Pt 1): 1557-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00858.x.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate potential savings associated with the Consumer Reports Best Buy Drugs program, a national educational program that provides consumers with price and effectiveness information on prescription drugs.

DATA SOURCES: National data on 2006 prescription sales and retail prices paid for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), β-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-coA) reductase inhibitors (statins).

STUDY DESIGN: We converted national data on aggregate unit sales of drugs in the four classes to defined daily doses (DDD) and estimated a range of potential savings from generic and therapeutic substitution.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We estimated that $2.76 billion, or 7.83 percent of sales, could be saved if use of the drugs recommended by the educational program was increased. The recommended drugs' prices were 15-65 percent lower per DDD than their therapeutic alternatives. The majority (57.4 percent) of potential savings would be achieved through therapeutic substitution.

CONCLUSIONS: Substantial savings can be achieved through greater use of comparatively effective and lower cost drugs recommended by a national consumer education program. However, barriers to dissemination of consumer-oriented drug information must be addressed before savings can be realized.

Huskamp, Haiden A, Julie M Donohue, Catherine Koss, Ernst R Berndt, and Richard G Frank. (2008) 2008. “Generic Entry, Reformulations and Promotion of SSRIs in the US.”. PharmacoEconomics 26 (7): 603-16.

BACKGROUND: Previous research has shown that a manufacturer's promotional strategy for a brand name drug is typically affected by generic entry. However, little is known about how newer strategies to extend patent life, including product reformulation introduction or obtaining approval to market for additional clinical indications, influence promotion.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationships among promotional expenditures, generic entry, reformulation entry and new indication approval.

METHODS: We used quarterly data on national product-level promotional spending (including expenditures for physician detailing and direct-to-consumer advertising [DTCA], and the retail value of free samples distributed in physician offices) for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) over the period 1997-2004. We estimated econometric models of detailing, DTCA and total quarterly promotional expenditures as a function of the timing of generic entry, entry of new product formulations and US FDA approval for new clinical indications for existing medications in the SSRI class. Expenditures by pharmaceutical manufacturers for promotion of antidepressant medications was the main outcome measure.

RESULTS: Over the period 1997-2004, there was considerable variation in the composition of promotional expenditures across the SSRIs. Promotional expenditures for the original brand molecule decreased dramatically when a reformulation of the molecule was introduced. Promotional spending (both total and detailing alone) for a specific molecule was generally lower after generic entry than before, although the effect of generic entry on promotional spending appears to be closely linked with the choice of product reformulation strategy pursued by the manufacturer. Detailing expenditures for Paxil were increased after the manufacturer received FDA approval to market the drug for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), while the likelihood of DTCA outlays for the drug was not changed. In contrast, FDA approval to market Paxil and Zoloft for social anxiety disorder (SAD) did not affect the manufacturers' detailing expenditures but did result in a greater likelihood of DTCA outlays.

CONCLUSION: The introduction of new product formulations appears to be a common strategy for attempting to extend market exclusivity for medications facing impending generic entry. Manufacturers who introduced a reformulation before generic entry shifted most promotion dollars from the original brand to the reformulation long before generic entry, and in some cases manufacturers appeared to target a particular promotion type for a given indication. Given the significant impact that pharmaceutical promotion has on demand for prescription drugs in the US, these findings have important implications for prescription drug spending and public health.

Wang, Junling, Zhiyong Dong, Song Hee Hong, and Katie J Suda. (2008) 2008. “A Comparison of Direct Medical Costs across Racial and Ethnic Groups Among Children With Cancer.”. Current Medical Research and Opinion 24 (3): 847-58. https://doi.org/10.1185/030079908X273390.

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies reported that some minority childhood cancer patients are likely to develop worse outcomes than white children. This study examines whether there are racial and ethnic disparities in health expenditures among children with cancer.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted among children (younger than 20) with cancer diagnoses in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS; 1996 to 2004). Total health expenditures and the following subcategories were examined across racial and ethnic groups: (1) office-based visits; (2) outpatient visits; (3) inpatient and emergency room visits; (4) home health care; (5) prescription drugs; and (6) dental, vision, and other health care expenditures. Consumer price indexes were used to convert all expenditures to 2004 dollars. A classical linear model was analyzed using the natural logarithm of health expenditures as the dependent variable, with the purpose of determining whether there were racial and ethnic differences in health expenditures after adjusting for confounding factors.

RESULTS: Study sample included 394 non-Hispanic whites (weighted to 4 958 685), 53 non-Hispanic blacks (weighted to 352 534), and 94 Hispanic whites (weighted to 424 319). Hispanic blacks and other minority populations were excluded from the analysis due to insufficient sample size. The annual total health expenditure for treating each child with cancer was $3467.40, $2156.15, and $5545.34, respectively, among non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks, and Hispanic whites. The differences in the various subcategories of health expenditures across racial and ethnic groups were generally not significant according to both descriptive and analytical analyses with very few exceptions.

CONCLUSIONS: This study did not identify significant racial and ethnic disparities in health care costs. However, one important study limitation is the small sample size of the minority populations in the study sample.

Wang, Junling, Daniel Mullins, Ilene H Zuckerman, Genene D Walker, Katie J Suda, Yi Yang, and Shelley I White-Means. (2008) 2008. “Medical Expenditure Panel Survey: A Valuable Database for Studying Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Prescription Drug Use.”. Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy : RSAP 4 (3): 206-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2007.06.018.

BACKGROUND: Despite the importance of equal access to prescription drugs by racial and ethnic groups, studies on access to prescription drugs have been incomprehensive.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) as a valuable data source to study racial and ethnic disparities in prescription drug use.

METHODS: Use of the MEPS database to study disparities in prescription drug use is detailed. This includes strengths and limitations of the database, as well as key methodological, sampling, and statistical issues to consider when using it.

RESULTS: Using MEPS allows researchers to control for sociodemographic and health status information when studying racial and ethnic disparities in prescription drug use. MEPS has taken measures to improve reliability of the information on the utilization of prescription drugs. An additional benefit of MEPS is that it has oversampled Hispanics, Blacks, and Asians; as such, it affords the statistical power to examine these minority groups. One limitation of MEPS is the inability of researchers to study some drug categories, because of limitations in statistical power. Moreover, the names of the prescription medications are not standardized in MEPS, and some information is not publicly available in MEPS databases. When conducting studies requiring information not publicly available, researchers may commute to the MEPS Data Center or may request the Data Center to run statistical programs for them.

CONCLUSIONS: Using MEPS to study racial and ethnic disparities in prescription drug use has significant benefits. Nonetheless, researchers need to keep in mind the limitations of using MEPS.

Gellad, Walid F, Sebastian Schneeweiss, Phyllis Brawarsky, Stuart Lipsitz, and Jennifer S Haas. (2008) 2008. “What If the Federal Government Negotiated Pharmaceutical Prices for Seniors? An Estimate of National Savings.”. Journal of General Internal Medicine 23 (9): 1435-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0689-7.

BACKGROUND: The government is prohibited from directly negotiating drug prices for Medicare Part D, resulting in substantial policy debate. However, the government has an established mechanism for setting prices with pharmaceutical manufacturers for certain other federal programs–the Federal Supply Schedule (FSS).

OBJECTIVE: To estimate how much could be saved nationwide if prices equivalent to the 2006 FSS were achieved for the top 200 drug formulations dispensed to seniors.

DESIGN/SETTING: Cross-sectional analysis of drug utilization patterns and costs from the nationally representative Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys (MEPS), 2003-2004, and the 2006 FSS.

PARTICIPANTS: Seniors who filled a prescription for any of these common drugs (n = 6,135 individuals).

MEASURES: Prescription expenditures were obtained from MEPS, and a price/unit was calculated in 2006 dollars. This price/unit was compared to the 2006 FSS, and a savings/unit was calculated and summed across the observed units dispensed in MEPS.

RESULTS: The potential annual savings with FSS prices would be $21.9 billion [95% confidence interval (CI), $21.1 billion to $22.8 billion]. If FSS prices were substituted for only the top ten drugs, the annual savings would be $5.9 billion (95% CI, $5.7 billion, $6.1 billion).

CONCLUSIONS: Extension of existing price setting mechanisms to Medicare could save tens of billions of dollars if prices similar to those already achieved by other federal programs could be reached. Whether or not this is a political or economic possibility, the magnitude of these savings cannot be ignored.

2007

Kilbourne, Amy M, Laurel A Copeland, John E Zeber, Mark S Bauer, Elaine Lasky, and Chester B Good. (2007) 2007. “Determinants of Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use by Patients With Bipolar Disorder.”. Psychopharmacology Bulletin 40 (3): 104-15.

OBJECTIVES: We determined the prevalence and correlates of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use among patients with bipolar disorder.

METHODS: Patients with bipolar disorder recruited from a large urban mental health facility from 2004 to 2006 completed a baseline questionnaire on CAM use, demographics, treatment perspectives, and behaviors. Additional data on current medications and clinical features were ascertained via chart review. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the patient sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment factors associated with use of different CAM practices.

RESULTS: Of 435 patients, the mean age was 49 years; 77% were white, 13% were black, and 10% other race/ethnicity. Patients reported a wide range of CAM use, including prayer/spiritual healing (54%), meditation (53%), vitamins or herbs (50%), and weight loss supplements (22%). Multivariable analyses controlling for sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment factors revealed that patients of other racial/ethnic groups (other than whites or Blacks), those diagnosed with bipolar spectrum disorders (other than bipolar I disorder), and those prescribed anticonvulsants (eg, valproic acid, carbamazepine), or atypical antipsychotics were most likely to use CAM.

CONCLUSIONS: A substantial number of patients diagnosed with bipolar disorder is using CAM. CAM use may be popular among patients with this illness because conventional pharmacotherapy for managing bipolar symptoms can also disrupt quality of life. Mental health providers should be aware of CAM use among patients with bipolar disorder and assess the potential impact of CAM use on treatment course.

Singla, Ish, Maliha Zahid, Chester B Good, Alanna Macioce, and Ali F Sonel. (2007) 2007. “Impact of Blood Transfusions in Patients Presenting With Anemia and Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome.”. The American Journal of Cardiology 99 (8): 1119-21.

Anemia has been shown to predict adverse events in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarctions (MIs). Less is known about the value of blood transfusions in this setting. We sought to evaluate the impact of red blood cell transfusions on outcomes. Transfusion in anemic patients admitted with suspected acute coronary syndrome/non-ST-elevation MIs led to a significant increase in 30-day recurrent MI or death (odds ratio 3.05, 95% confidence interval 1.80 to 5.17, p <0.001). This relation persisted after adjusting for significant univariate predictors: hypotension on presentation, pulmonary edema, and increased troponin-I levels (odds ratio 2.57, 95% confidence interval 1.41 to 4.69, p <0.001). In conclusion, the risk versus benefit of transfusion in patients presenting with an acute coronary syndrome needs careful assessment.