Publications

BACKGROUND: The risk of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM), both prescription and over-the-counter, use in dementia patients is high. Informal caregivers often facilitate patients' use of medications, but the effect of caregiver factors on PIM use has not been a focus of previous research.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine PIM use in dementia patients and caregivers and identify caregiver risk factors for PIM use in dementia patients.

METHODS: We conducted a secondary data analysis of the baseline wave of the Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregiver's Health study. The sample comprised 566 persons with dementia aged 65 and older and their coresiding family caregiver. PIM was defined using the 2003 Beers criteria and was examined in both dementia patients and their caregivers. Caregiver and patient risk factors included a range of sociodemographic and health variables.

RESULTS: In dementia patients, 33% were taking at least 1 PIM, and 39% of their caregivers were also taking a PIM. In fully adjusted models, the following caregiver factors were associated with an increased risk of dementia patient PIM use: caregiver's own PIM use, spouse caregivers, Hispanic caregivers, and greater number of years that the caregiver has lived in the United States. Increased caregiver age was associated with a decreased risk of PIM use in patients.

CONCLUSIONS: PIM use may be higher in dementia patients and their informal caregivers compared with the general older adult population. Further, patterns of medication use in 1 member of the dyad may influence PIM risk in the other dyad member. These results suggest that interventions to increase appropriate medication use in dementia patients and their caregivers should target both members of the dyad and target over-the-counter agents along with prescription medications.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to describe changes in glyburide prescribing in cohorts that were and were not targeted by a risk reduction project, assess factors associated with glyburide discontinuation, and evaluate changes in glycated hemoglobin (ie, HbA(1c)) levels and rates of serious hypoglycemia.

METHODS: This historical cohort study included a targeted cohort of 4368 outpatient veterans aged ≥65 years with active prescriptions for glyburide between April 1, 2007 and June 30, 2007 and serum creatinine (SCr) ≥2 mg/dL and a nontargeted cohort of 1886 outpatients meeting these same criteria between July 1, 2007 and September 3, 2007. The intervention in the risk reduction project took place on September 4, 2007 and entailed giving regional pharmacy leaders information about the increased risk of hypoglycemia with glyburide and the list of targeted patients for follow up with providers. For each patient, the study period was the time between the date they first met the eligibility criteria and March 31, 2008. All data were obtained from Veterans Affairs (VA) administrative databases. The primary outcome was the discontinuation of glyburide. Secondary outcomes were the change in HbA(1c) after stopping glyburide and the rate of serious hypoglycemia after intervention.

RESULTS: Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for glyburide discontinuation in targeted versus nontargeted cohorts were statistically significantly elevated in September (IRR 2.1; 95% CI 1.7-2.5), October (IRR 1.3; 95% CI 1.1-1.6), and November 2007 (IRR 1.4; 95% CI 1.1-1.7). The intervention, black race, SCr, Charlson comorbidity score, new glyburide use, and VA region were independently associated with discontinuation. Among patients in the targeted cohort who discontinued glyburide, mean (SD) HbA(1c) at baseline and after discontinuation were 7.17% (1.35%), and 7.22% (1.34%), respectively (P = 0.36). The hypoglycemia rates/1000 person-days were 0.093 before the intervention and 0.070 afterwards (P = 0.10).

CONCLUSION: A one-time intervention in a risk reduction project decreased glyburide use over a 3-month period in elderly outpatients with renal insufficiency without compromising glucose control.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the change in use of high-risk medications for the elderly (HRME), as defined by the National Committee on Quality Assurance's Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) quality measure (HEDIS HRME), by older outpatient veterans over a 3-year period and to identify risk factors for HEDIS HRME exposure overall and for the most commonly used drug classes.

DESIGN: Longitudinal retrospective database analysis.

SETTING: Outpatient clinics within the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

PARTICIPANTS: Veterans aged 65 by October 1, 2003, and who received VA care at least once each year until September 30, 2006.

MEASUREMENTS: Rates of use of HEDIS HRME overall and according to specific drug classes each year from fiscal year 2004 (FY04) to FY06.

RESULTS: In a cohort of 1,567,467, high-risk medication exposure fell from 13.1% to 12.3% between FY04 and FY06 (P<.001). High-risk antihistamines (e.g., diphenhydramine), opioid analgesics (e.g., propoxyphene), skeletal muscle relaxants (e.g., cyclobenzaprine), psychotropics (e.g., long half-life benzodiazepines), endocrine (e.g., estrogen), and cardiac medications (e.g., short-acting nifedipine) had modest but statistically significant (P<.001) reductions (range -3.8% to -16.0%); nitrofurantoin demonstrated a statistically significant increase (+36.5%; P<.001). Overall HEDIS HRME exposure was more likely for men, Hispanics, those receiving more medications, those with psychiatric comorbidity, and those without prior geriatric care. Exposure was lower for individuals exempt from copayment. Similar associations were seen between ethnicity, polypharmacy, psychiatric comorbidity, access-to-care factors, and use of individual HEDIS HRME classes.

CONCLUSION: HEDIS HRME drug exposure decreased slightly in an integrated healthcare system. Risk factors for exposure were not consistent across drug groups. Future studies should examine whether interventions to further reduce HEDIS HRME use improve health outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Understanding provider perceptions of and experiences with order entry and order checks (drug alerts) in an electronic prescribing system may help improve medication safety technology.

DESIGN: Cross-sectional, national survey of Veterans Administration physicians practicing in various specialties.

MEASUREMENT: Thirty-five question instrument was divided into 4 content domains. Response options included dichotomous, numeric, multiple choices, and Likert-like scales. Statistical methods included logistic regression.

RESULTS: The adjusted response rate was 1543 of 3588 (43%). Almost all providers (90%) felt that the VA electronic prescribing system, including its order checks, improved prescribing safety to some degree. Most respondents (72%) reported that they always or almost always document outside medications in a clinic note, although only 44% always or almost always entered outside medications in the non-VA medication data field. Most physicians (88%) who encountered serious allergic or adverse drug reactions reported either notifying a pharmacist or entering the information in the allergies/adverse reactions field. Generalists and physicians with higher numbers of prescriptions were more likely to enter relevant data into the electronic medical record (or notify a pharmacist, in the case of adverse reactions). In addition, 48% of providers described critical drug-drug interaction alerts as very useful; medical specialists found these less useful, whereas surgical specialists found these more useful when compared with generalists.

LIMITATIONS: Survey was conducted within a single healthcare system.

CONCLUSION: Computerized provider order entry and related order checks are perceived to improve prescribing safety; however, provider entry of some relevant information into the appropriate electronic fields may not be optimal.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate Medicare Part D's impact on use of antihypertensive medications among seniors with hypertension.

DATA SOURCES: Medicare-Advantage plan pharmacy data from January 1, 2004 to December 12, 2007 from three groups who before enrolling in Part D had no or limited drug benefits, and a comparison group with stable employer-based coverage.

STUDY DESIGN: Pre-post intervention with a comparison group design was used to study likelihood of use, daily counts, and substitutions between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARBs).

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Antihypertensive use increased most among those without prior drug coverage: likelihood of use increased (odds ratio = 1.40, 95 percent confidence interval [CI] 1.25-1.56), and daily counts increased 0.29 (95 percent CI 0.24-0.33). Proportion using ARBs increased from 40 to 46 percent.

CONCLUSIONS: Part D was associated with increased antihypertensive use and use of ARBs over less expensive alternatives.

BACKGROUND: Mirizzi syndrome (MS) is characterized by extrinsic compression of the common hepatic duct by stones impacted in the cystic duct or gallbladder neck. Open cholecystectomy (OC) has been the standard treatment; however, laparoscopy has challenged this approach.

STUDY DESIGN: The objective of this study was to review our clinical experience with MS since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and determine the impact of alternative approaches. We conducted a retrospective review of patients with MS from January 1987 to December 2009.

RESULTS: There were 36 patients with MS among 21,450 cholecystectomies (frequency 0.18%). Seventeen were women. The most common presenting symptoms were abdominal pain (n = 23) and jaundice (n = 19). Preoperative diagnostic studies included ultrasonography (n = 27), CT (n = 24), and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (n = 32). Cholecystectomy was performed in 35 patients; LC was initiated in 15 and OC in 21. Conversion rate from LC to OC was 67%. Five patients who had successful LC had type I MS. Of the patients who underwent LC with conversion or OC, 14 had type I and 16 had type II MS. The cystic duct for type I and the bile duct for type II MS were managed diversely according to surgeon's preference. There was no operative mortality. Morbidity was 31% with Clavien class I in 2, IIIa in 4, IIIb in 1, and IV in 3 patients. Mean hospitalization was 9 days (range 2 to 40 days). Mean follow-up was 37 months (range 1 to 187 months).

CONCLUSIONS: Low incidence and nonspecific presentation of MS precludes referral and substantive individual experience. Although LC may be applicable in selected patients with type I MS, OC remains the standard of care.

CONTEXT: Collaborative depression care management (DCM), by addressing barriers disproportionately affecting patients of racial/ethnic minority and low education, may reduce disparities in depression treatment and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of DCM on treatment disparities by education and race/ethnicity in older depressed primary care patients.

DESIGN: Analysis of data from the randomized controlled trial Prevention of Suicide in Primary Care Elderly: Collaborative Trial (PROSPECT).

SETTING: Twenty primary care practices.

PARTICIPANTS: A total of 396 individuals 60 years or older with major depression. We conducted model-based analysis to estimate potentially differential intervention effects by education, independent of those by race/ethnicity (and vice versa).

INTERVENTION: Algorithm-based recommendations to physicians and care management by care managers.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Antidepressant use, depressive symptoms, and intensity of DCM over 2 years.

RESULTS: The PROSPECT intervention had a larger and more lasting effect in less-educated patients. At month 12, the intervention increased the rate of adequate antidepressant use by 14.2 percentage points (pps) (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7 to 26.4 pps) in the no-college group compared with a null effect in the college-educated group (-9.2 pps [95% CI, -25.0 to 2.7 pps]); at month 24, the intervention reduced depressive symptoms by 2.6 pps on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (95% CI, -4.6 to -0.4 pps) in no-college patients, 3.8 pps (95% CI, -6.8 to -0.4) more than in the college group. The intervention benefitted non-Hispanic white patients more than minority patients. Intensity of DCM received by minorities was 60% to 70% of that received by white patients after the initial phase but did not differ by education.

CONCLUSIONS: The PROSPECT intervention substantially reduced disparities by patient education but did not mitigate racial/ethnic disparities in depression treatment and outcomes. Incorporation of culturally tailored strategies in DCM models may be needed to extend their benefits to minorities.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier for

PROSPECT: NCT00279682.